Mapping and Strengthening Civil Society Response to Disinformation

1. What are the regional patterns and trends of the misuse of anti-fake news laws in South and Southeast Asia?
2. How are civic actors, specifically journalists and activists, responding to these laws?
3. What could be the good practices of disinformation regulation in terms of platform governance, which prevents their misuse by governments?
4. What could be the countermeasures by civic actors for preventing autocratic use of anti-fake news laws by governments?

Our contributions are:
Our major outcome is a virtual knowledge platform for awareness-building and cross-learning activities between stakeholders (academics, journalists, activists, and policy-makers) against the autocratic use of anti-fake news laws by governments. Our academic outcomes include providing a dataset on how governments define "disinformation" across South and Southeast Asia; what are the mechanisms through which "disinformation laws" become a form of digital repression by governments; and chart civil society countermeasures against this for the protection and promotion of democratic and digital rights. Further, our policy papers focus on improving disinformation regulation in the region and strengthening civil society countermeasures against the abuse of anti-fake news laws by governments.