Justifying Repression in Authoritarian Regimes of the Arab World: Official Framing and Target Audiences

Leitung
Dr. Maria Josua
Laufzeit
2019 - 2023
Förderung
German Research Foundation (DFG)
Kooperationspartner

Dr. Alexander Dukalskis, University College Dublin, Ireland

Dr. Mirjam Edel, University of Tübingen, Germany

Prof. Merouan Mekouar, York University, Canada

Dr. Kressen Thyen, University of Bremen, Germany

Prof. Sean Yom, Temple University, USA

Dr. Holger Zapf. Göttingen University, Germany

Tabs

Beschreibung

Research Questions:

  • How do state officials in authoritarian regimes justify repression?
  • Why were certain justifications chosen in the repression of Arab uprising protests?

Contribution to International Research

This project offers a dynamic perspective on how repression can sustain authoritarianism. Its major innovation is the conceptualization of a novel framework of justifications of repression in authoritarian regimes. It studies various types of justifications of repression, their application in different branches of government, why they are chosen, and what effect they have. The project not only considers repressive acts by the executive, but also includes repression by the legislative and in jurisdiction, going beyond conventional research. The Arab uprisings will be a focal point for analyzing the justifications in the repression of protests in Morocco and Tunisia, adding to the burgeoning Arab Spring literature. The project findings will also contribute to protest and repression research as well as to literature on political communication. Research on comparative authoritarianism will benefit from the framing approach, but mostly from the innovative focus on target audiences of justification.

Research Design and Methods

The project’s research design is a structured, focused comparison of Tunisia and Morocco. The analysis will show how in these two cases facing a similar challenge during the Arab uprisings, the outcome of diverging types of repression justification depended on different justifying actors, different (inter)national target audiences, and differences in path dependency, leading to divergent trajectories.
A qualitative approach is appropriate for uncovering working mechanisms of the processes leading to certain justifications. As no ready-made theories are at hand for analyzing this novel topic, the project will proceed in an exploratory manner to develop causal explanations in a plausibility probe.
Multiple methods such as content analysis of legal documents, framing analysis of media reports, and process tracing will help investigate different research objectives. Sources will include archival documents, news reports, and qualitative semi-structured interviews with relevant actors. A mapping of justifications of repression between 2001 and 2010 serves as the baseline for diachronic within-case comparison of how the policing of Arab uprisings protests was justified. Process tracing will shed light on the rationale for certain justifications as well on their reception by analyzing framing and counterframing. Besides repressive acts by the executive, also the justification of anti-terror legislation as a legislative tool of repression will be considered. In addition, justifications brought forward in court trials will illuminate the judiciary’s role in repression.

Forschungsteam

Forschungsschwerpunkt

Institut