Prior consultation is an increasingly accepted instrument internationally for guaranteeing the rights of indigenous peoples. Conceived of theoretically as a means for conflict resolution, in practice it lies at the heart of social conflicts all over Latin America. Using concepts from the "contentious politics" approach, we take a closer look at Peru – where indigenous mobilizations would lead to the only Latin American consultation law enacted to date. We also critically analyze the content and formulation of its regulating norm. We argue that this new legislation will not help to turn such consultations into a tool for conflict resolution as long as the normative framework itself is contested and the necessary basic conditions are not in place. The most important conditions that we identify for implementing effective prior consultation are impartial state institutions capable of justly balancing the diverse interests at stake, measures that reduce power asymmetries within consultations, and joint decision‐making processes with binding agreements.
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 23, 2018, 3, 521-540
World Development, 108, 2018, 74-85
Development and Change, 48, 2017, 6, 1439-1463
in: Hans-Jürgen Burchardt / Stefan Peters / Nico Weinmann (eds.), Entwicklungstheorie von heute - Entwicklungspolitik von morgen, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017, 241-256
Third World Quarterly, 38, 2017, 5, 1043-1057