In recent decades, there has been significant debate about the representation of the various world regions in international relations research. This paper contributes to the debate by providing the results of a survey of 290 research articles published over the last decade in three leading disciplinary journals. The survey shows that non‐Western cases are indeed underrepresented in the research. However, an analysis of the research articles according to their research topics, objectives, and methodology finds no explanation for this underrepresentation. I argue in this paper that the inclusion of non‐Western cases is important to secure the validity of international relations research. "Representative crossregional comparison," which is based on comparative area studies approaches, is presented as a research design that addresses this issue.
International Area Studies Review, online first, 2020
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34, 2017, 3, 217-239
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 2016, 2, 226-255
International Interactions, 41, 2015, 5, 857-881
Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (ZeFKo), 4, 2015, 1, 115-146