Can global governance become more democratic? Dawisson Belém Lopes argues that global intergovernmental organizations play a crucial role in this process and analyzes how democratic organizations such as the UN and UNESCO currently are.
© Reuters/Eric Thayer
In this paper, I assume that global intergovernmental organizations (GIGOs) function as "enablers" of interstate liberal politics by way of their multilateral institutional frameworks. To support this view, I recall and adapt the classical concept of "polyarchy," coined in the early 1950s by Robert A. Dahl.
It consists of a two‐dimensional theoretical construct applicable for measuring the level of liberalization in modern political societies. It follows that the more actors who take part in politics, and the more that institutions allow political opposition, the more open a society (of states) is likely to be. I thus wish to assess and rate the level of "polyarchization" of 23 GIGOs that cover various issue areas and fit some specific criteria (for example, more than one hundred member states from at least three different continents). The methodology section includes a scorecard that I have specially developed to help achieve these research objectives.
Dawisson Belém Lopes, Polyarchies, Competitive Oligarchies, or Inclusive Hegemonies? A Comparison of 23 Global Intergovernmental Organizations (GIGOs) Based on Robert Dahl’s Political Theory, GIGA Working Paper, No. 265, Februar 2015
Comparative Area Studies (CAS), the GIGA’s flagship methodological approach, keeps going strong: APSA newsletter devotes symposium to CAS and a new edited volume is under preparation.
Uganda had one of the strictest lockdowns in East Africa, including closing all but essential businesses, dusk-to-dawn curfews, and bans on both private and public transport vehicles. We take a look at how these measures affected people and businesses in the informal economy.
Review of a successful year 2019