Julia Grauvogel / Christian von Soest

Claims to Legitimacy Count: Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes

European Journal of Political Research , 53, 2014, 4, 635–653
Publisher website | DOI

Abstract
International sanctions are one of the most commonly used tools to instigate democratisation in the post-Cold War era. However, despite long-term sanction pressure by the European Union, the United States and/or the United Nations, non-democratic rule has proven to be extremely persistent. Which domestic and international factors account for the regimes’ ability to resist external pressure? Based on a new global dataset on sanctions from 1990 to 2011, the results of a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) provide new insights for the research on sanctions and on authoritarian regimes. Most significantly, sanctions strengthen authoritarian rule if the regime manages to incorporate their existence into its legitimation strategy. Such an unintended ‘rally-round-the-flag’ effect occurs where sanctions are imposed on regimes that possess strong claims to legitimacy and have only limited economic and societal linkages to the sender of sanctions.

Related Research at the GIGA

Related Research Tabs

GIGA Authors

Dr. Julia Grauvogel

Senior Research Fellow
Speaker Research Team

Recent Publications by the Authors

Julia Grauvogel / Hana Attia

How do international sanctions end? Towards a process-oriented, relational, and signaling perspective

Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, forthcoming

Hana Attia / Julia Grauvogel

Easier In Than Out: The Protracted Process of Ending Sanctions

GIGA Focus Global, 05/2019

Marcus Tannenberg / Michael Bernhard / Johannes Gerschewski / Anna Lührmann / Christian Von Soest

Regime Legitimation Strategies (RLS), 1900 to 2018

V-Dem Working Papers, 2019, 86

Tabea Lakemann / Christian von Soest

Ten Things to Watch in Africa in 2019

GIGA Focus Africa, 01/2019